In his blog
"A View from the Q", Paul Boraswki, indicates that he has attended a
meeting in Washington organized by "Smart Manufacturing LeadershipCoalition." Coalition had assembled multiple organizations interested in generate
business intelligence linked to process automation and technology solutions to
transform businesses into profit innovation centers.
With this
background Paul asks ASQ Influential Voices Group, how well understood are the
contributions of the quality professional beyond what is traditionally thought
of as the quality function?
The first
thing that comes to mind is that we must start with a broader definition of
what a quality professional is. I believe that is the person who has the
knowledge, skills and abilities to support organizations to develop strategies
that lead to results and long-term growth. To do this, in his toolbox he should
have multiple tools to achieve that purpose and incorporate new ones according
to the changing needs of his customers.
Quality
must now move beyond the boundaries of organizations, to use the concepts,
techniques and tools in solving the problems of the whole society, starting from
an internal perspective and looking beyond how it affects all stakeholders.
Quality
must evolve into a body of knowledge to ensure sustainability, therefore must
have three axes: help produce results, to care for the planet and make all
humans involved in the process have a better life.
Quality
should therefore support to generate a system to meet the current and potential
needs of the society.
The current
challenge is therefore THE BIG Q (without sacrificing quality at the base); it
means get top corporate managers vision Quality as the main factor to add value
to the system, as an essential part of the culture of organizations and
society.
With that
horizon Quality must include suppliers, organizations, customers, and the whole
society. Quality must be taught as a knowledge management strategy transversal
to any system. If we all speak the same
language, it builds confidence, which leads to growth.
If the
control and improvement are the traditional paradigms of quality, new skills are
needed to stimulate new ideas, innovation and dynamic exchange processes.
This
expanded Quality should be aimed at seeking growth, developing talent at all
levels of the organizations, optimize costs, drive innovation, develop
corporate reputation, build customer loyalty, and achieve sustainable growth.
The
question I have is as quality professionals, are we moving towards these new
paradigms to achieve that with our work, in order quality will focus on this new
scenario.
César Díaz